Keycloak vs Microsoft Entra ID
Keycloak and Microsoft Entra ID are both open source iam solutions. Keycloak open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization, while Microsoft Entra ID microsoft's cloud identity platform with deep M365 and Azure integration. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Updated Feb 2026The Bottom Line
Choose Keycloak if completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count is your priority and organizations with engineering expertise that want full control over their identity platform, avoid vendor lock-in, and eliminate IAM licensing costs. Choose Microsoft Entra ID if included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops matters most and organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that want unified identity management across their Microsoft ecosystem.
Choose Keycloak if:
- You value completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count
- You value full source code access enables deep customization
- You value self-hosted deployment gives complete data sovereignty
- You want to avoid best experience limited to Microsoft ecosystem applications
- You want to avoid non-Microsoft application integrations can be less polished than Okta
Choose Microsoft Entra ID if:
- You value included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops
- You value deep native integration with Azure, M365, and Defender ecosystem
- You value conditional access policies are among the most powerful in the industry
- You want to avoid requires significant engineering effort to deploy, scale, and maintain
- You want to avoid no managed cloud service — you own all infrastructure operations
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Keycloak | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open source) / Red Hat SSO for enterprise support | Free tier included with M365 / P1 from $6/user/month / P2 from $9/user/month |
| Pricing Model | Free open source with optional commercial support | Per-user monthly subscription (tiered) |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Self-Hosted | Cloud |
| Best For | Organizations with engineering expertise that want full control over their identity platform, avoid vendor lock-in, and eliminate IAM licensing costs | Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that want unified identity management across their Microsoft ecosystem |
| User federation with LDAP and Active ... | Supported | Not available |
| Fine-grained authorization services (... | Supported | Not available |
| Admin console and account management ... | Supported | Not available |
Sources
- Keycloak — Official Website & DocumentationVendor
- Microsoft Entra ID — Official Website & DocumentationVendor
- Keycloak Reviews on G2User Reviews
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on G2User Reviews
- Keycloak Reviews on TrustRadiusUser Reviews
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on TrustRadiusUser Reviews
- Keycloak Reviews on PeerSpotUser Reviews
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on PeerSpotUser Reviews
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Access Management 2024Analyst Report
- Forrester Wave: Identity-As-A-Service (IDaaS), Q4 2024Analyst Report
- KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Access Management 2024Analyst Report
- Gartner Peer Insights: Access ManagementPeer Reviews